{"id":209,"date":"2001-08-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-08-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/archive-201-week-24-racindeals\/"},"modified":"2001-08-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2001-08-22T00:00:00","slug":"archive-201-week-24-racindeals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/archive-201-week-24-racindeals\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 24 RacinDeals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\"><b>UNHAPPY HOUR<\/b>: I just happened to<br \/>\ntune in to TNT&#8217;s coverage of Happy Hour at Michigan, right about<br \/>\nthe time Michael Waltrip wrecked. His car came to rest with the<br \/>\ndriver&#8217;s side next to the wall and caught fire. Waltrip, wearing<br \/>\nthe HANS\u00ae device, had to take the device off in order to get out<br \/>\nof the car on the right side. Luckily, the fire wasn&#8217;t spreading<br \/>\ntoo fast, or Waltrip could have been badly burned.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I was surprised to hear in his comments<br \/>\nafter the crash that this was the first time he&#8217;d ever had to<br \/>\nexit the car on the right side. I remember watching the Late<br \/>\nModels being inspected one time at Nashville Speedway, and part<br \/>\nof the inspection process that day was to see if the driver could<br \/>\nget out of the right side of the car.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Two things: the HANS\u00ae device again (for<br \/>\nthe 3rd or 4th time this season) inhibited a driver when he<br \/>\nneeded to get out of a car on fire; and I&#8217;m astonished that<br \/>\nNASCAR hasn&#8217;t mandated some type of inspection where they see how<br \/>\nfast it takes a driver to exit the right side of the car. With<br \/>\npeople like Jeff Burton using seats that have long head rests on<br \/>\nthe right side, you&#8217;d think NASCAR would want to make sure those<br \/>\nhead rests didn&#8217;t interfere with the driver in case of fire.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>TELEMETRY TRIALS<\/strong>: Boo and<br \/>\nhiss to those few teams that chose not to run the telemetry box.<br \/>\nMost notably, Jeff Gordon, Ricky Rudd, and Dale Jarrett. Sure,<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re all afraid to take chances because they&#8217;re the top three<br \/>\nin the championship chase, but what good did it do them? Is Rudd<br \/>\nnot going to run an engine next week because his engine failed<br \/>\nthis week?<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In 945 out of 946 uses through the first 22<br \/>\nraces this year, the boxes worked fine. One bad installation amounts to<br \/>\nabout 1\/10th of one percent chance of failure. Those odds are<br \/>\npretty good if you ask me. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">And with NASCAR mandating that the teams<br \/>\nrun a &quot;black box&quot; next year, what&#8217;s going to happen if one of those<br \/>\ncauses a problem? Are we going to see the internet racing sites go crazy with<br \/>\ndrivers claiming that &quot;NASCAR cost me the race?&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>TIM RICHMOND<\/b>: I got some hate email<br \/>\nfrom a fellow who obviously took offense at my comments about Tim<br \/>\nRichmond. By all accounts, Richmond was an incredible driver.<br \/>\nHeck, he even won a race after going through a bout of illness<br \/>\nrelated to AIDS.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">But I don&#8217;t suggest anyone go out and<br \/>\ncontract this deadly disease to emulate Richmond.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>MEDIA LIES<\/strong>: &quot;A driver<br \/>\nwas killed Sunday during a race&#8230;&quot; reads the intro to the<br \/>\nstory about the sad death of Dean Roper. Every news account I<br \/>\nread before the true cause of his death was released said that he<br \/>\ndied after wrecking. This is just sloppy reporting and there&#8217;s no<br \/>\nexcuse for it.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The Roper family has had to endure more<br \/>\nthan one family should in the past year. Reporting that a crash<br \/>\nwas the cause of death in this situation just adds to the misery<br \/>\nthat they must be going through.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Condolences once again to the Roper family.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>MEDIA CIRCUS<\/strong>: Can you<br \/>\nimagine how much of a circus the Tuesday announcement of the<br \/>\nresults of the Earnhardt investigation would have been had the<br \/>\nmedia been informed of who NASCAR had doing the investigation?<br \/>\nActually, had the media got the information they wanted (e.g.<br \/>\nwho&#8217;s conducting the investigation, etc.), we probably wouldn&#8217;t<br \/>\nbe having the results now. They&#8217;d have been delayed by the<br \/>\ncountless questions from reporters that would have inevitably<br \/>\nhappened.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I had a chance to watch most of the report<br \/>\nlive. I fully expected that the news media would think I&#8217;m too stupid to<br \/>\nunderstand all those big words and would tell me what I should<br \/>\nthink about this. Sure enough, almost before the press<br \/>\nconference was over, I saw reports where &quot;NASCAR&#8217;s&quot;<br \/>\nexperts are blaming the belt&#8230;and that&#8217;s not what I heard. They<br \/>\nsaid it was one factor among several.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The only people to blame for this media<br \/>\ncircus is the public. We obviously buy the garbage they&#8217;re<br \/>\nputting out. If everyone boycotted these so-called &quot;reporters&quot;<br \/>\nand their papers and web sites, maybe they&#8217;d get the message.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>MEDIA MADNESS<\/b>: I&#8217;m not sure which is<br \/>\nmore frustrating: watching news organizations like CBS make<br \/>\nstupid remarks about the Dale Earnhardt investigation (e.g.<br \/>\n&quot;the report doesn&#8217;t say how to prevent accidents&quot;), or<br \/>\nwatching racing reporters like Monte Dutton make stupid remarks<br \/>\nabout it on national TV.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>CLOSURE<\/strong>: So, the media<br \/>\ntells us that everyone was expecting &quot;closure&quot; with the<br \/>\nreport of the investigation. But now that the report has been<br \/>\nreleased, we find that (surprise) there&#8217;s no way anyone could<br \/>\nknow what happened precisely to cause Earnhardt&#8217;s death. If any<br \/>\none of 3 or 4 things had not happened simultaneously, Earnhardt<br \/>\nwould probably still be here.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Sometimes you just can&#8217;t explain a freak<br \/>\naccident.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>SIMPSON VS. NASCAR<\/b>: Unfortunately,<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s more likely to be the title of a lawsuit than one of my RacinDeals here. Bill Simpson is sill insisting his belt wasn&#8217;t at<br \/>\nfault. While that may be true to some extent, his belt did break.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">\nSo instead of being the safety innovator, he&#8217;s going around with his lawyers blaming NASCAR, Dale<br \/>\nEarnhardt, Richard Childress, and anyone else who happens to<br \/>\ncross his path. Instead of playing the blame game, he should be<br \/>\nworking to find out exactly why his belt broke, and what can be<br \/>\ndone to prevent it in the future.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> He certainly has every right to<br \/>\nsay &quot;the belt wasn&#8217;t installed correctly and it broke.&quot;<br \/>\nAnd while that may be true in a legal sense, it&#8217;s not very<br \/>\nhelpful.&nbsp; Was Mike Harmon&#8217;s belt not installed correctly at<br \/>\nNashville in April? And isn&#8217;t there a pending lawsuit against Simpson<br \/>\nregarding another broken belt? Is the &quot;installation wrong,<br \/>\nnot my fault&quot; defense working in that case?<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>GRAND OLD LAWSUIT<\/strong>: Cracker<br \/>\nBarrel is suing NASCAR, Speedway Motorsports, Fox, and anyone<br \/>\nelse they think they have a shot at. Why? Seems they think that<br \/>\nthey were supposed to get more than four mentions on the air<br \/>\nduring their race last spring at Atlanta Motor Speedway.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">There are a few things that need to be<br \/>\nasked about this suit that won&#8217;t even go to trial for another 16<br \/>\nmonths: Did Cracker Barrel sign a sponsorship contract that<br \/>\nguaranteed that they&#8217;d get mentioned on TV? If so, how can a<br \/>\nthird party be bound to a contract that it isn&#8217;t a part of? In<br \/>\nother words, how could Fox be obligated to even acknowledge the existence of Cracker<br \/>\nBarrel when they weren&#8217;t a signatory on the<br \/>\ncontract?<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">What&#8217;s NASCAR got to do with it? If the<br \/>\ncontract was between Speedway Motorsports and Cracker Barrel,<br \/>\nwhy involve NASCAR? Supposedly, NASCAR interfered with the<br \/>\nexisting contract between Cracker Barrel and Speedway<br \/>\nMotorsports by retaking the TV rights from the tracks and signing<br \/>\ntheir contract with Fox.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">All these and other details will probably<br \/>\nnever be revealed because this will be settled out of court. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">If you&#8217;re a sponsor that wants mentions of<br \/>\nyour name or product on TV these days without buying a ton of<br \/>\ncommercial time during the race, there&#8217;s only one way to do it:<br \/>\npurchase the naming rights to a track. You think Lowe&#8217;s paid any<br \/>\nsponsorship money to Fox? Probably not. But when they go to<br \/>\nCharlotte Motor Speedway, they refer to it by the sponsor name,<br \/>\nso Lowe&#8217;s gets a ton of exposure that they&#8217;re not paying the<br \/>\nnetworks for.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>SPONSORSHIP MONEY NOT NEEDED<\/b>: One<br \/>\ncompany that doesn&#8217;t need to spend any money on advertising or<br \/>\nsponsorship is Hubbard\/Downing, Inc. You&#8217;ve never heard of<br \/>\nHubbard\/Downing, Inc. you say? They&#8217;re the makers of the HANS\u00ae<br \/>\nHead And Neck Support\u00ae device. While Cracker Barrel can&#8217;t get<br \/>\nmentioned more than 4 times in a race broadcast, it seems that<br \/>\nall we hear are references to HANS\u00ae. Surely they know how much<br \/>\nfree exposure they&#8217;re getting.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">So, from all the media attention the HANS\u00ae<br \/>\ndevice has gotten lately, you&#8217;d think it&#8217;s designed to prevent<br \/>\ninjury or death, right? I mean, isn&#8217;t that the whole idea behind<br \/>\nit? Why then do you have to sign a pre-purchase agreement that<br \/>\nsays this: &quot;No warranty or representation of any kind is<br \/>\nmade as to the merchantability or fitness for any purpose as to<br \/>\nany HANS\u00ae device.&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Would you trust your life to something that<br \/>\ndoesn&#8217;t have a &quot;fitness for any purpose?&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Also, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want anyone other<br \/>\nthan the helmet manufacturer messing with the integrity of the<br \/>\nhelmet shell. You have to send Hubbard\/Downing, Inc. your helmet<br \/>\nso they can install the clips necessary to attach the HANS\u00ae<br \/>\nstraps. Of course, you waive your rights to file suit against<br \/>\nHubbard\/Downing, Inc. when you buy the device, so those guys are<br \/>\nin the clear.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>HELMETS<\/strong>: Since everyone<br \/>\nseems to be on the safety bandwagon these days, I might as well<br \/>\njump on. Dale Earnhardt refused to wear a full-faced helmet<br \/>\nbecause he believed it contributed to the death of his friend<br \/>\nNeil Bonnett. That makes sense. If your head moves forward enough<br \/>\nso that the front of the helmet hits your chest, then that&#8217;ll act<br \/>\nas a fulcrum and extend the back of the neck, possibly causing a<br \/>\nlot of damage. Plus, the weight of the helmet has to be a factor<br \/>\nas well. Also, a driver&#8217;s vision could be obstructed by the full<br \/>\nface helmet.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">But on the other side, you have a situation<br \/>\nlike we had with Ward Burton a few years ago. Burton used to wear<br \/>\nan open-faced helmet but received an injury to his face in a<br \/>\nwreck that caused him to start wearing the full-faced helmet.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">So, what&#8217;s the solution?<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I think I have one, that&#8217;s simple, light<br \/>\nweight, and I think will be as effective as current full-faced<br \/>\nhelmets but without the dangers. What is it? Facemasks. Yeah,<br \/>\nfacemasks like the ones on a football helmet. It could be as<br \/>\nsimple as the one or two bars that you typically see on a<br \/>\nquarterback&#8217;s helmet. Mount the bars on an open-faced helmet and<br \/>\nyou get the protection without the risks. It&#8217;d be lighter, but<br \/>\nyou&#8217;d still have the protection from the bars.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>SPEAKING OF LAWSUITS<\/b>: The ASA is<br \/>\nsuing TNN to try to prevent them from tape delaying a couple of races in the<br \/>\nremainder of the season. Since TNN was taken over by the suits in New York, it&#8217;s<br \/>\ngone so far downhill it&#8217;s pathetic.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">ASA had what they thought was a good deal<br \/>\nwhen they signed a contract with TNN giving TNN 5 year exclusive broadcast<br \/>\nrights. TNN acquired a 25% equity stake in the company at the time. Then a few<br \/>\nmonths later, TNN was acquired by Viacom, and they put it under the control of<br \/>\nthe yahoos who run MTV. It was just a matter of time at that point. (I didn&#8217;t<br \/>\nlike the fact that TNN acquired an ownership position in ASA racing at the time,<br \/>\nand wrote about it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.racindeals.com\/record.asp?ArticleID=20\">here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">TNN lost the NASCAR deal but gained WWF. (Incidentally,<br \/>\nthey&#8217;ve had much higher ratings with the WWF than they ever had with NASCAR).<br \/>\nThis Saturday night, TNN will debut a new wrestling show at 10 pm. One of the<br \/>\nraces they want to tape delay is on a Saturday night (September 29) and you have<br \/>\nto think that TNN is not willing to delay or preempt their new wrestling show so<br \/>\nthey can show the race live.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">TNN has also made it clear to the ASA that<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re not interested in broadcasting motorsports. This could be a severe blow<br \/>\nto this racing organization that&#8217;s produced such stars as Rusty Wallace, Mark<br \/>\nMartin, Alan Kulwicki, Johnny Benson, the Sauters, and others.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Maybe we need to start lobbying ESPN to<br \/>\npick up the ASA races for next year.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>HAPPY BIRTHDAY<\/b>: The current NASCAR<br \/>\nWinston Cup points system is 26 years old this week. There&#8217;s been<br \/>\na lot of criticism leveled against the system, but in my opinion,<br \/>\nthere&#8217;s nothing better out there. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>UNHAPPY HOUR: I just happened to tune in to TNT&#8217;s coverage of Happy Hour at Michigan, right about the time Michael Waltrip wrecked. His car came to rest with the driver&#8217;s side next to the wall and caught fire. Waltrip, wearing the HANS\u00ae device, had to take the device off in order to get out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-original-archive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}