{"id":435,"date":"2002-07-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-07-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/archive-428-more-daytona-postscript-and-a-chicagoland-prelim\/"},"modified":"2002-07-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-07-11T00:00:00","slug":"archive-428-more-daytona-postscript-and-a-chicagoland-prelim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/archive-428-more-daytona-postscript-and-a-chicagoland-prelim\/","title":{"rendered":"More Daytona Postscript and a Chicagoland Prelim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NASCAR&#8217;s &quot;fuzzy&quot; red-flag rules are still being discussed after the<br \/>\nFirecracker 400 and the predictable calls for more clearly-defined rules are<br \/>\ngoing out. The obvious proposal is a green-white-checker rule common to short<br \/>\ntracks and the Truck Series. It would certainly work at all the tracks. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.journalnow.com\/wsj\/MGBUNDNAF3D.html\" target=\"_blank\">The<br \/>\ncaveat<\/a> is always added that it would not work at Daytona and Talladega<br \/>\nbecause &quot;it would almost certainly lead to a big wreck.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>There they go again, blaming the rules for drivers&#8217; own boneheadedness. For<br \/>\nyears the drivers kept insisting that the rules are the problem. You see, it&#8217;s<br \/>\nnever the drivers&#8217; fault, it&#8217;s never them, it&#8217;s ALWAYS something else.<\/p>\n<p>And the drivers are whining that the fans wanted to see wrecks &#8211; said Robby<br \/>\nGordon, &quot;Besides, they probably got to see what they wanted to see, and<br \/>\nthat&#8217;s a lot of wrecks.&quot; Jeremy Mayfield said, &quot;I don&#8217;t know what we<br \/>\nhave to do (to please fans at Daytona and Talladega).&quot;<\/p>\n<p>First off, the fans do not particularly want to see wrecks. Fans want to see<br \/>\nRACING &#8211; side by side competition, passing and repassing, dicing for the win.<br \/>\nEnding the Firecracker under yellow cheated the fans (and the other drivers) out<br \/>\nof a shot at the win.<\/p>\n<p>There was commentary after last October&#8217;s Alabama 500 about how fans were<br \/>\nsupposedly cheering the melee on the last lap, but such was self-deceiving<br \/>\nnonsense. The cheering was for Dale Junior&#8217;s win. Tony Stewart was also the<br \/>\nmagnet of fan reaction for his slam at Talladega fans, and when he was knocked<br \/>\nout in the crash in April, that is what fans were cheering, not the fact of a<br \/>\nbig crash. There was also fan cheering when Jeff Gordon got T-boned at Talladega<br \/>\nin 1999 &#8211; the fans cheered the fact he was eliminated from the race.<\/p>\n<p>Jeremy, what the drivers have to do to please the fans is what I noted last<br \/>\ntime out &#8211; stop blaming the rules for boneheadedness in driver ranks; stop<br \/>\ncomplaining about how &quot;miserable&quot; or stressful restrictor plate racing<br \/>\nis; stop lobbying for changes that castrate the ability of the cars to run open<br \/>\nthrottle; admit you were wrong about the roof spoiler and lobby to get it back<br \/>\non the cars; and race for the win for the entirety of the race.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>The other gripefest at Daytona was the apparently slow reaction of the safety<br \/>\ncrew, and among the whines is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.racinwithruss.com\/columns\/view_column.php\" target=\"_blank\">Russell<br \/>\nSchmidt&#8217;s piece<\/a>, with a silly dire warning that &quot;had (Brett) Bodine<br \/>\nstill been in the car, we&#8217;d be talking about the latest fatality.&quot; No we<br \/>\nwouldn&#8217;t, Russ &#8211; the safety crew got to the car in expedient time, saw Brett was<br \/>\nokay and that the initial flash fire extinguished itself, and went to cars that<br \/>\nwere in more immediate need. Schmidt approvingly cites the rescue teams in CART,<br \/>\nIRL, and NHRA, but none of those groups would have handled that situation any<br \/>\nbetter.<\/p>\n<p>This issue was clearly a red herring even before <a href=\"http:\/www.news-journalonline.com\/2002\/Jul\/9\/SPDWC1.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Jim<br \/>\nHunter <\/a>stood up for Daytona&#8217;s safety crew. Hunter should not have had to<br \/>\nbelabor what was obvious &#8211; that the crews went to the cars that were most<br \/>\ndamaged first after seeing that Dale Jarrett and Brett Bodine and others were<br \/>\nclearly okay. Jarrett&#8217;s &quot;the hell with them&quot; remark about the ambulance<br \/>\nwas sheer petulance on his part &#8211; the hell with you, Jarrett; just because you<br \/>\nsuck as a racecar driver doesn&#8217;t give you the right to act like a spoiled child.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Amid everything there appears be a growing rift between drivers and fans.<br \/>\nReactions to the rowdiness of the fans at Daytona suggests that at least some of<br \/>\nthese drivers are no longer up to racing. Granted throwing stuff on the<br \/>\nracetrack is outlandish, but fans do have a right to be angry at drivers, who<br \/>\nseem increasingly exasperated with the fans.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve seen more and more lectures to fans from drivers like Jarrett and Jeff<br \/>\nBurton about how the fans should accept inferior competition rather than<br \/>\nthree-abreast lap-after-lap combat for the lead. It shows &#8211; A, drivers like<br \/>\nthose two are more concerned with points and the paycheck, not with winning &#8211;<br \/>\nand B, they&#8217;ve been coddled for so long that seeing angry reaction from fans,<br \/>\nhowever excessive, comes off like a complete surprise.<\/p>\n<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be. Again, Richard Childress had it right after the greatest<br \/>\nrace in NASCAR history, the 2000 Winston 500: &quot;The race fans got the race<br \/>\nthey deserve.&quot; Between their self-important lobbying against the roof<br \/>\nspoiler and so forth, their constant refusal to accept fault for boneheadedness<br \/>\nin their ranks &#8211; contrast Dale Jarrett and other Winston Cup drivers&#8217; blame for<br \/>\ncrashes on anything except themselves to Eddie Cheever&#8217;s famous tirade after the<br \/>\nJune 2001 IRL Texas 500; Cheever took other drivers to task for the way they<br \/>\nraced, in close quarters hardly dissimilar to Daytona &#8211; their arrogant lectures<br \/>\nto fans to accept inferior competition over real racing, and their own excessive<br \/>\nconcern for points and the paycheck, more than a few Winston Cup drivers deserve<br \/>\nto be booed and deserve to themselves be lectured about what racing is all<br \/>\nabout, something they have apparently forgotten.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Yet it would be wrong to assign all blame for the sport&#8217;s present competitive<br \/>\nquandary on the drivers. Daytona again showed that the sport can&#8217;t afford<br \/>\naero-clean racecars; aero anchors are necessary. It should not be necessary to<br \/>\nagain point out that when they ran the roof spoiler blocking was drastically cut<br \/>\ndown and passing was far easier and more prolific.<\/p>\n<p>With Daytona done the sport moves on to Chicagoland, and the prospect is for<br \/>\na dismal weekend with little passing and some bone-jarring crashes to be<br \/>\nexpected &#8211; with impacts likely to be harder there than at Daytona. The common<br \/>\nrunning target of blame is that the cars supposedly have &quot;too much&quot; down force,<br \/>\ngenerating some 1,300 pounds versus the 700 of around 1995. A by-product has<br \/>\nbeen the hardening of Goodyear tires.<\/p>\n<p>John Darby has expressed desire for a lower down force car, but this plan is<br \/>\ndependent on softer Goodyear tires, and Goodyear does not want to go back to<br \/>\nsofter tires given that its new generation hard tires are working well enough<br \/>\nthat blistering and wear are non-issues.<\/p>\n<p>The complaint by some crew chiefs is that these hard tires allow drivers to<br \/>\nrun them wide open instead of managing them. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.journalnow.com\/wsj\/sports\/autoracing\/MGBDFM0AC3D.html\" target=\"_blank\">Jimmy<br \/>\nMakar<\/a> for one claims, &quot;inside Goodyear there are a lot of guys who<br \/>\nfavor&#8230;&#8230; getting back to a tire that gives up a little bit, that is a little<br \/>\nsofter, that drivers can &#8216;hurt&#8217; (and abuse and thus) they start going<br \/>\nbackwards&#8230;. so that the guy who takes care of his tires is more in the<br \/>\ngame.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>First off, saving your tires may be smart, but it is not racing &#8211; it is just<br \/>\ndriving around, waiting instead of making things happen. Second, does Makar make<br \/>\nno connection between softer tires that wear quicker, and team tire bills? (Last<br \/>\ntime I checked, JGR got their tires free of charge, so perhaps Makar hasn&#8217;t made<br \/>\nthat connection.) What we&#8217;ve seen with Goodyear&#8217;s hard tires is that teams have<br \/>\nless need to change tires, and we&#8217;ve seen numerous occasions where teams could<br \/>\nskip tire changes and wound up finishing well. So with less need to change<br \/>\ntires, tire bills can only be helped &#8211; whether it is sufficiently is likely an altogether<br \/>\ndifferent story.<\/p>\n<p>Remember Tiregate at NHIS in 1998? Those tires were substantially softer<br \/>\nthen; today, Goodyear&#8217;s hard tires are such that skipping a final tire change<br \/>\nisn&#8217;t as big a deal anymore. While there is need for some changes to Goodyear&#8217;s<br \/>\ntires &#8211; such as higher stagger and a widening of the tread so the tires better<br \/>\nhelp the car turn and teams can race harder on them in the corners longer &#8211; the<br \/>\nhardness is no liability.<\/p>\n<p>That the tires don&#8217;t wear and cars are running almost the same speeds at the<br \/>\nend of a run as at the beginning is not why side-by-side racing has disappeared.<br \/>\nThe reasons are the elimination of the draft &#8211; Makar says that with increased down force<br \/>\nthe cars have also increased drag; this, though, is exceedingly difficult to<br \/>\nbelieve given how little air is displaced by the cars &#8211; the excessive tightness<br \/>\nof the cars, and the lack of ability to lean hard on tires through the corners.<\/p>\n<p>After Chicagoland the NASCAR stars invade New Hampshire, and after Cup<br \/>\nqualifying the Modifeds will race; they usually change the lead 20 times in 100<br \/>\nlaps, and the reasons why they can lie in their use of restrictor plates; the<br \/>\nenormity of the hole punched in the air due to high-drag aero; the far superior<br \/>\ngrip due to their own down force and the width of their tires; that their tires<br \/>\n(for the record, Hoosier bias-plies), due to width and stagger, allow the<br \/>\ndrivers to race hard on them through the corners. In the Mods the bigger NASCAR<br \/>\ndivisions have the answers they can apply to vastly improve their own<br \/>\ncompetitive juices.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Rumors, rumors &#8211; first it is Bobby Hamilton penciled in for Petty<br \/>\nEnterprises, now Ken Schrader has supposedly been penciled in. Hamilton, though,<br \/>\nis the better choice &#8211; he&#8217;s won in the last six seasons, he&#8217;s familiar with the<br \/>\nteam, and he&#8217;s worked with their aero engineer Richard Buck.<\/p>\n<p>More rumors &#8211; Ricky Rudd has supposedly been talking with Jerry Jones. Why<br \/>\nwould Rudd take a chance like that toward the end of his career?<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about how Jeff Gordon has gone 25 races without a<br \/>\nwin and that it is his longest stretch without a win.<\/p>\n<p>It is not. He went the 1992 Dixie 500 until the 1994 World 600 before winning<br \/>\n&#8211; a span of 41 races before his first win came, in his 42nd start.<\/p>\n<p>Whether it is 25 or 41, this winless streak doesn&#8217;t compare to much longer<br \/>\nwinless streaks by drivers more deserving of sympathetic press than Gordon.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Finally, if you thought Shawna Robinson was going to last in the #49, think<br \/>\nagain &#8211; Ron Hornaday will drive the car at Chicagoland and there is no realistic<br \/>\nprospect that Shawna will get it back for long, if at all. So just go away,<br \/>\nShawna.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASCAR&#8217;s &quot;fuzzy&quot; red-flag rules are still being discussed after the Firecracker 400 and the predictable calls for more clearly-defined rules are going out. The obvious proposal is a green-white-checker rule common to short tracks and the Truck Series. It would certainly work at all the tracks. The caveat is always added that it would not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-original-archive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/racindeals.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}